Florida’s draft law imposes encryption backgrounds for social media accounts described “dangerous and stupid”
A draft draft law in Florida, which requires social media companies, has provided background factors for encryption for law enforcement officials to reach user accounts, and has cleared a major legislative obstacle and will now apply to the Senate Hall of the state to vote.
Florida lawmakers unanimously agreed to push the draft law through the committee, for each Florida policy.
The draft “social media use by minors” (SB 868), if transferred to the law, will require social media platforms to provide a mechanism for coding coding from one side to the party when the application of the law gets a summons order. ” The bill will also require social media companies to allow parents or guardians to access the child’s account, and prevent children from using the advantages that allow the use of hidden messages.
Critics, including technology companies and industrial institutions that have long been opposing the bill, have argued that weakening encryption will make people less safe by adhering to the safety of their own messages, and may lead to data violations.
In the blog post last week, Frontier Group Digital Group Foundation criticized the draft law, arguing that encryption is “the best tool we must protect our communications via the Internet”, and that passing the law is likely to lead to the removal of companies for coding for minors and making these users less safe.
The Eff wrote: “The idea that Florida can” protect “minors by making it less safe and stupid.”
The Florida Bill depends on the state law, which was issued last year, in a brief social media of people under the age of 16. The law remains largely suspended while it remains in the courts of courtesy amid questions about the constitutionality of the law.
Technology companies, such as Apple, Google and Meta, are increasingly working to encrypt their user data so that their own content is accessible only, not even the companies themselves. This also helps protect private messages for infiltrators or those familiar with the malicious company. By encrypting user data, technology companies say they cannot also provide the law app with unable to access.
It is not clear whether the proposed Florida bill, as written, requires social media companies to comply with a summons only, which is usually issued by law enforcement agencies and without judicial supervision.
Naturalism notes are usually registered by the judge, but it can still be used by the law application to force limited amounts of account information, such as names, email addresses, or phone numbers, from technology companies about their users. Companies will often demand the vision of an inspection note of the court, which requires the police to submit a higher degree court of evidence for suspected criminality, before delivering user messages.
A draft law against Florida (HB 743) has a final committee vote to clarify it before it extends to the House of Representatives Hall for voting, for every Florida policy.